![]() I usually use foobar2000, because it's easy for me to drag-'n'-drop on-the-fly playlists from my manually-organized folders that I browse instead of using a graphical user interface. ![]() In fact, I would like a better design (not this Windows 95 thing), but I don't care about it enough to start looking for a new player. I use foobar because it's very light, doesn't eat my resources for unnecessary stuff like visualisation andisn't bloated with other things I don't need. You can sort it by artist, album, title, genre, folder structure and make playlists. The only thing to consider when choosing a music player I see is the design, and sometimes the way it organizes your music. It's much simpler to just get a better recording - if the original doesn't satisfy you, you can't squeeze out much of it with software. ![]() I mean they can be fine-tuned to a specific track or even album to make it sound better, but when playing something else, they might be irrelevant. Some of them have equalizers and other "effects", but in my opinion they all just spoil the recordings. What they do is "ask" the codec to decompress a file and then send the result to your sound card's driver. They all use the same FLAC codec in the end.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |